Groups, led by Food & Water Watch, Animal Legal Defense Fund, Campaign for Family Farms and The Environment, Friends of the Earth, Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy and Southern Environmental Law Center, urged USDA not to further subsidize factory farms under the guise of climate action. The push also comes as nearly 200,000 Friends of the Earth members have signed a petition to USDA demanding the agency end its support of the factory farm system.

“Factory farm gas and its dirty methane digesters have no place in our clean energy future or sustainable agriculture,” said Food & Water Watch Senior Food Policy Analyst Rebecca Wolf, an organizer of the letter. “USDA’s latest approved practices only double down on pollution, and divert millions in much-needed federal climate funding from smaller, more sustainable producers. Secretary Vilsack must stop the flow of Inflation Reduction Act conservation funding toward Big Ag’s greenwashing schemes.”

As the letter states, factory farming and the production of factory farm gas are costly industrial practices that “will exacerbate climate change, waste taxpayer dollars, and harm Indigenous peoples and environmental justice communities. This directly contradicts the intent of the Inflation Reduction Act and the stated priorities of the Biden Administration.”

“EPA reporting is clear that factory farms are responsible for significant greenhouse gas emissions,” said Ben Lilliston, Director of Climate Strategies at the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy. “It makes no sense to spend valuable conservation dollars on high cost practices that subsidize this factory farm system at the expense of real conservation practices that can benefit farmers and the climate.”

“By prioritizing Inflation Reduction Act climate spending on factory farming-related practices, USDA is diverting valuable taxpayer dollars away from farmers and ranchers who are truly fighting climate change and instead rewarding Big Ag’s pollution,” said Molly Armus, Animal Agriculture Policy Program Manager at Friends of the Earth. “Subsidizing expensive greenwashing practices like factory farm gas will further entrench industrial animal agriculture and allow for the unbridled polluting of rural communities to continue. This directly undermines the Biden Administration’s stated commitment to environmental justice. We urge USDA to change course and listen to the hundreds of organizations and 200,000 Friends of the Earth members asking it to stop subsidizing factory farms.”

As the letter points out, “according to an analysis by the Institute for Agriculture and Trade Policy, just seven anaerobic digesters in California used nearly $2 million in EQIP funding – enough to support the average cost of 238 farms planting cover crops.”

“Using public money to build digesters for factory farm manure isn’t climate-smart,” said Patty Lovera of the Campaign for Family Farms and the Environment, a coalition of state and national organizations working to change policies that prop up the factory farm system. “Independent family farms raising livestock sustainably have been shut out of conservation programs for years due to lack of funding, so it makes no sense to use new funding on expensive false solutions like factory farm gas.”

“Funding under the Inflation Reduction Act (IRA) should be reserved for true conservation practices that prioritize and advance sustainability, climate mitigation, and environmental protection,” said Alicia Prygoski, Strategic Legislative Affairs Manager at the Animal Legal Defense Fund. “The Animal Legal Defense Fund is extremely concerned to see that factory farms will be eligible to receive funding for practices that pollute our air and water, exacerbate the climate crisis, and harm animals – practices that directly contradict the goals of the IRA. We are proud to join nearly 200 other organizations in asking the USDA not to use conservation funding to prop up an industry that will further entrench us in an unsustainable animal agricultural farming system.”

Contacts: Phoebe Galt, Food & Water Watch, 202-683-2504, pgalt@fwwatch.org

Shaye Skiff, Friends of the Earth, 202-222-0723, kskiff@foe.org

Mike Heymsfield, Animal Legal Defense Fund, 707-364-8387, media@aldf.org

The post Groups Oppose Use of Inflation Reduction Act Funding for Polluting Factory Farms appeared first on Friends of the Earth.

In response, Kelly McNamara, Senior Research and Policy Analyst with Friends of the Earth US, issued a statement on behalf of the Stop Financing Factory Farming campaign:

While today’s vote to broaden the World Bank’s mandate to address the climate crisis is a positive step forward, the World Bank’s actions must echo its words. If the World Bank intends for its operations to match its new mission, the Bank must end support for industrial livestock production. 

The climate consequences of industrial animal agriculture are staggering. Studies estimate livestock production will use up nearly half the world’s 1.5°C emissions budget by 2030 and 80% by 2050. The World Bank’s continued support for the global expansion of factory farming is exacerbating the climate crisis at a time when the Bank has committed to align its strategies, investments, and activities with the Paris Agreement’s aim of limiting global warming to well below 2°C and pursuing efforts to limit the temperature increase to 1.5°C. To help preserve our collective chances at a world free of poverty on a livable planet, the World Bank must cease its support for factory farming, the continued expansion of which threatens to keep the goals of the Paris Agreement and the UN Sustainable Development Goals firmly out of reach.  

Today, we urge the World Bank to seize this pivotal moment to align its food sector investments with its expanded mission. This must involve shifting support away from corporate conglomerates engaged in highly extractive and destructive agricultural practices. It must also involve directing support toward diversified, agroecological, mixed crop and livestock and plant-based systems that not only deliver climate and biodiversity-related benefits but also support small-scale farmers who are the backbone of community food sovereignty and food security. To forego this opportunity would be a disservice to the planet and future generations.

To learn more about why the Bank’s investments in industrial livestock are at odds with its Paris Agreement Commitments, read the  Stop Financing Factory Farming Campaign’s recent report. 

Contact: Holly Shulman, Holly.Shulman@gmail.com

The Stop Financing Factory Campaign works in partnership with locally affected communities and organizations to shift development finance away from industrial livestock production. Campaign Steering Committee members include: the Bank Information Center, Friends of the Earth U.S., the Global Forest Coalition, International Accountability Project (Early Warning System), Sinergia Animal, and World Animal Protection.

The post Stop Financing Factory Farming Coalition Reacts to World Bank’s Climate Commitment appeared first on Friends of the Earth.

As world leaders meet tomorrow in Paris to discuss the role of public finance in addressing “climate change and the global crisis”, delegates should press multilateral development banks (MDBs) to invest in line with the Paris Agreement, including by ending their expansion of factory farming.

Animal agriculture contributes up to a fifth of global greenhouse gas (GHG) emissions, including a third of the world’s methane emissions. Because methane has over 80 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO2) over a 20-year timeframe, swift and absolute reductions from the livestock sector are vital to keeping the Paris Agreement climate targets within reach.

According to leading researchers, even if fossil fuel emissions were immediately halted, livestock emissions could make it impossible to limit warming to 1.5°C and difficult to limit it to “well below” 2°C.

MDBs livestock investments

Despite this, since 2010, the World Bank and other Multilateral Development Banks (MDBs) have invested over $4.6 billion of public money to help expand large-scale livestock production, exacerbating the climate crisis while also driving deforestation, biodiversity loss, and air and water pollution.

Tomorrow world leaders will meet in Paris for the Summit for a New Global Financing Pact, organized by French President Emmanuel Macron and Barbadian Prime Minister Mia Mottley.

The summit will address key issues, including reform of multilateral development banks, with the goal of “addressing climate change and the global crisis.” Central to such reform should be a commitment by MDBs to end their support for GHG-intensive and highly environmentally destructive industrial livestock operations.

On his first day as World Bank President, Ajay Banga made climate change a clear priority by directing his staff to “double down” on their climate efforts. But words aren’t enough. The World Bank and other MDBs must take concrete steps to preserve the best possibility of limiting global warming to “well below” 2°C. In agriculture, this translates into shrinking, not expanding, the global industrial livestock sector.

Fatal flaws

MDBs are fueling the global expansion of factory farming while failing to account for the sector’s impacts on climate.

In a new report we co-authored on behalf of the Stop Financing Factory Farming Campaign (S3F), we argue that flaws in MDBs’ frameworks for aligning their investments with the Paris Agreement are resulting in the misclassification of industrial livestock investments as compatible with the Agreement’s mitigation and adaptation goals.

A key flaw is that the frameworks are based on countries’ Nationally Determined Contributions (NDCs)–the climate plans they submit to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change (UNFCCC). But the UN’s climate body itself actually finds that NDCs are “not on track to meet climate goals.”

Equally important, only 40% of countries incorporate livestock into their NDCs, and none have set methane reduction targets from the sector. MDBs’ Paris Alignment frameworks also fail to account for the extreme vulnerability of intensive, highly centralized livestock operations to climate-related heat stress, disease spread, and water shortages.

None of the world’s leading MDBs currently require that industrial livestock sector borrowers provide comprehensive (Scope 1-3) emissions reporting or commit to absolute, time-bound GHG reduction targets.

IFC’s poor record

Even more concerning, a comprehensive analysis by Bank Climate Advisors reveals that the World Bank’s private sector arm, the International Finance Corporation (IFC), has systematically failed to apply its own GHG-related environmental standards which are already insufficient to the task of reducing absolute emissions from industrial livestock production.

Only last month, IFC approved a $32 million loan to Brazilian dairy giant Alvoar Lacteos and a $47 million loan to GXYX, a massive pig farm operation in China, despite civil society concerns and opposition to each. Neither company has committed to comprehensive GHG reporting or reductions or time-bound zero-deforestation targets, and neither has addressed other negative l impacts of value-chain activities, including biodiversity loss from feed production and grazing.

Often, MDBs use arguments about food security and the need to keep food prices low to justify investments in resource-intensive factory farming operations.

In reality, however, a shift away from industrial livestock production toward agroecological systems could more efficiently and equitably feed the planet. These systems prioritize smaller-scale farmers and communities, help facilitate a shift toward sustainable, plant-forward diets, conserve natural resources, and yield significant climate and biodiversity-related benefits.

To honor their commitments to Paris Alignment, MDBs should shift their agricultural investments toward climate-friendly agroecological farming systems that support food sovereignty and food security, and end their investments in intensive, polluting and high-emitting industrial livestock operations. Shifting investments in this way would deliver economic, public health, food security, and climate dividends now and for future generations.

The post Multilateral banks’ investments in industrial livestock undermine their Paris climate commitments appeared first on Friends of the Earth.

Download the executive summary
Download the report
Read the Inside Climate News story and our op-ed 

This report, authored by Friends of the Earth on behalf of the Stop Financing Factory Farming (S3F) campaign, and endorsed by eighteen civil society organizations, argues that multilateral development banks’ (MDBs) investments in industrial livestock are at odds with their commitments to align their investments and activities with the Paris Agreement. With just over six years left to avoid the most catastrophic effects of climate change and rein in factory farming-driven crises of deforestation, biodiversity loss, and the overuse and pollution of the planet’s air, land, and water, the S3F campaign is calling on MDBs to stop financing the expansion of the global industrial livestock sector.  

”Climate Misalignment” documents how MDBs’ frameworks for aligning their investments with the Paris Agreement are resulting in misclassification of industrial livestock investments as compatible with the Agreement’s mitigation and adaptation goals, and urges development banks to exclude industrial livestock and feed operations from sectors they consider “Paris-aligned.” The report makes several recommendations for improving climate mitigation requirements for any industrial livestock investments, including mandatory Scope 1-3 greenhouse gas (GHG) reporting and time-bound absolute emission reduction targets. 

The report details livestock’s contributions to climate change, including that the sector contributes up to a fifth (19.6%) of global GHG emissions and a third of the world’s methane emissions. Because methane has over 80 times the global warming potential of carbon dioxide (CO2) over a 20-year timeframe, swift and absolute reductions from the livestock sector are vital to keeping the Paris Agreement climate targets within reach. According to leading researchers, even if fossil fuel emissions were immediately halted, livestock emissions could make it impossible to limit warming to 1.5°C and difficult to limit it to “well below” 2°C. 

Where livestock production can improve nutrition, food security, and livelihoods, the report recommends that MDBs, in consultation with local communities, should shift their support toward diversified, agroecological, mixed crop and livestock and plant-based systems that deliver climate and biodiversity-related benefits and support small-scale farmers who are the backbone of community food sovereignty and food security. Providing such support would also enable MDBs to better meet their pledges to align their investments and activities with the UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs). 

About the authors: Kelly McNamara is a senior research and policy analyst and Kari Hamerschlag is deputy director of food and agriculture at Friends of the Earth U.S. 

This report is endorsed by the Stop Financing Factory Farming (S3F) campaign and the following organizations: 

Bank Information Center (BIC)
Brighter Green
Catholic Agency for Overseas Development (CAFOD)
Center for Ecosystems Research and Development-Uganda (CERD)
Chilis on Wheels
Climate Save Movement
Compassion in World Farming
Family Farm Defenders
Feedback Global
Fórum Nacional de Proteção e Defesa Animal
Global Forest Coalition
In Defense of Animals (IDA)
International Accountability Project (IAP)
Plant Based Treaty
ProVeg International
Real Food Systems
Sinergia Animal
True Animal Protein Price Coalition
World Animal Protection

The post Climate Misalignment appeared first on Friends of the Earth.

“Our extensive interviews with community members found that PRONACA’s intensive pig farms in the Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas region have continued to pollute the air and contaminate rivers, killing off fish which local people rely on for food and jobs, and are harming local tourism. CEDENMA is deeply concerned about IFC and IDBInvest’s failure to adequately enforce its standards and mandates with respect to PRONACA’s severe impacts on the water and the health of locally affected indigenous communities,” said Natalia Greene, Vice President, CEDENMA. “We are urging the public development banks and the government to enforce their policies and laws and help resolve long standing impacts of PRONACA’s operations on the health and wellbeing of indigenous communities.”  

Since 2004, the IDB and the IFC have provided more than $200 million USD in loans to PRONACA, Ecuador’s 4th largest corporation, the last being 50 million dollars each in 2021 to increase the production of chickens and pigs, among other activities. The report finds that the most recent loans violate several of the policies of these public development banks – whose purpose is to promote the protection of natural resources and social equity – affecting the communities and indigenous peoples of the province of Santo Domingo.

“We used to have a thriving tourism industry, and now we only have polluted air and water. The expansion of pig farms in our community will bring even more pollution to our already contaminated communities. We have filed many complaints about the company to the local authorities but they have not listened to us or done anything to resolve the problems,” said Ricardo Calazacon, a local indigenous leader and medicinal plant expert.

“By giving millions of dollars of public money to PRONACA, IDB Invest and the IFC are violating their own policies and causing negative impacts to Indigenous communities and fragile ecosystems in Santo Domingo de los Tsáchilas. This report is more evidence that every dollar spent on factory farming harms communities and jeopardises development progress. Public development banks must stop propping up a failing system, stand alongside Indigenous groups and stop financing factory farming,” said Kari Hamerschlag, Deputy Director, Food and Agriculture, Friends of the Earth U.S. 

In order to raise awareness about the harms of these loans and PRONACA’s operations, CEDENMA and its NGO partners are launching a social media campaign using the hashtag #PRONACAContamina. They are also releasing a new short video based on the testimonials of local community members that were presented in Detrás de la Carne. 

The report documents significant harms and policy violations: 

• Local communities close to the pork and poultry operations in the communities of Peripa and Chigüilpe are unaware of the company’s expansion plans, despite bank policies that require the disclosure and dissemination of “environmental and social information relevant to the interested parties”.
• Indigenous communities in the area of ​​influence were not informed or consulted about these new operations as required by Ecuadorian law and IDB policies.
• Lawsuits and the company’s inaction regarding the 2009 court ruling establishing a commission to monitor and document environmental impacts in the communities of Puerto Limón, Valle Hermoso, San Gabriel del Baba and Peripa were not taken into account. This  court order has so far not been applied.
• Failure to ensure that PRONACA obtains new licenses for expansion activities, despite the fact that the IDB documents mention that these expansions are likely to require new licenses.
• Residual impacts were not addressed. The rivers downstream of this industrial operation, on which the communities previously depended for their livelihoods, are no longer usable. The company has not addressed these or other significant residual impacts, as required by proper application of the Banking Performance Standards.
• Odorous emissions have not been mitigated and have long been one of the negative impacts of intensive animal husbandry and slaughter operations.

Since the banks and government authorities have neglected their own policies that require genuine stakeholder participation, informed consent, transparency and accountability, local communities and their Ecuadorian and international NGO partners request IFC and IDB Invest to undertake the following actions:

1. Greater disclosure of information. IFC and IDB Invest should require the company to transparently disclose the following information:
   1. Current and planned numbers and types of animals, with precise locations.
   2. Operating permits for said facilities and expansion plans.
   3. Cumulative impact assessments and specific environmental management plans.
   4. Comprehensive environmental monitoring and compliance reporting for all groundwater/aquifer withdrawals, wastewater treatment discharges, and gaseous emissions.
2. Require the company to have a surface and groundwater quality monitoring program and ensure those results are publicly available.
3. Establish meaningful consultation with affected indigenous communities, so that community members can raise concerns without fear of retaliation.
4. Require the company to install deep bedding materials on all of its hog farms owned and contracted to improve animal welfare and sanitary conditions and to minimize impacts on air quality in local communities.
5. Establish more stringent requirements to reduce supply chain impacts. With the company sourcing animal feed from approximately 800 suppliers, it is critical that it put in place a much more rigorous system of assessment, monitoring, reporting and verification to understand the impacts of feed producers on biodiversity, GHG emissions and deforestation. This system must be independent and related data available to interested parties.
6. Encourage the implementation of the judicial resolution of 2009 (No. 0567-08-RA of July 16, 2009), which establishes a commission of representatives from the government, the company and the community to monitor, evaluate and mitigate the damages related to the “operation of the biodigesters, the consumption of water, and the management of organic and inorganic waste that is dumped into bodies of water”.
7. Investigate the impacts of business operations to determine if compensation is warranted to indigenous communities.

We request that the National Government:

1. Activate a joint commission.
2. Ensure all licenses are granted necessary and that the environmental plans are presented and executed.
3. Implement an environmental audit.
4. Recognize the constitutional rights of local communities.

Implementation of the above recommendations can alleviate the suffering of affected communities, restore impacted ecosystems, and provide a model of good environmental and social governance. Taking these steps is also required by bank policies and Ecuadorian law.

Recording of the press conference livestream here

Communications contact: Haven Bourque, haven@havenbmedia.com, 415-505-3473 

The post New Report Documents Social and Environmental Harms of PRONACA’s Animal Agriculture Operations on Indigenous Communities appeared first on Friends of the Earth.

World Bank presidents are traditionally chosen by the U.S. as part of the country’s outsized power over the multilateral development bank. This disproportionate control by a Global North nation has fallen under criticism from environmental and civil society groups that are calling for WBG leadership that is more globally representative. When multiple crises like fossil fuel-driven climate change and unstable food systems require urgent attention, the bank’s status-quo operations are insufficient.

President Biden’s pick continues a long-standing pattern of choosing men who are tied to the private sector, rather than a leader in global development and social justice who can provide the guidance needed to transform the Bank. Banga, a current member of the Dow Chemical Company board of directors, and a former employee of multinational giants such as PepsiCo and Nestle, has a history of prioritizing corporate interests over climate and civil society.

Kate DeAngelis, International Finance Program Manager for Friends of the Earth, said this:

We don’t need another World Bank president who will further corporate interests like fossil fuels and industrial agriculture. The bank should be striving for just, equitable development as part of its vision and purpose to confront global challenges. Banga has no background in public service, mitigating climate change, promoting sustainable agriculture, reducing poverty or supporting a just energy transition. He represents U.S. corporations rather than the needs of 8 billion people around the world. 

We are also disappointed to see the World Bank continue a “boys’ club” tradition of male leadership rather than pursuing a female candidate with extensive background in human rights, environmental advocacy and sustainable energy development. Friends of the Earth calls for the U.S. to pursue a selection process that is more democratic and inclusive of Global South voices.

The post Friends of the Earth Denounces Biden’s Pick to Lead World Bank appeared first on Friends of the Earth.